Monday, October 24, 2016

When Politics Drive Religion



Even though the cold war was an ideological war, the West decided to take it to religion rather than ideology. So, the political currents that use the religion as a political approach were escalated, during the Cold War, to fight against communism, as if the communist is a synonym for atheism, and as if the West was against the communism only for a religious reason.
The examples of these political currents are the Republican Party in the United States, the Conservative Party in the United Kingdom, and the Islamist groups in the Middle East. The coalition between these currents was very clear in The Soviet–Afghan War, during the eighties of the last century, when the Reagan administration trained the Islamist groups there, and supplied them with weapons.
So, when the Soviet Union fell the ideological war was ended, to start the religious war. These political currents become savages. In America, the Republican Party sponsored the marriage between politics, religion, business, and media. This marriage gave birth to the corruption that we see every day, for example when arms factories paid a lot of money to Republican senators to oppose gun control bill. This corruption explains why the Republican Party stands against social and economic Justice, so it opposes Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, the health insurance (Obama Care), same sex marriage, gun control, and raising the minimum wage for ordinary workers. On the other hand, it defends only the big business men, and justifies wars by using the media that wears the mask of piety, faith and morals, such as Rupert Murdoch's media “Fox Network”.
In the Middle East, because of the absence of democracy, the Islamist groups could not impose their agenda in democratic means, like the Republican Party. So some of them took up arms and turned to terrorism and political assassinations.
The structural similarities between these currents do not appear only in the exploitation of religion to justify their political agenda. They clearly appear also when both justify their existence and extremism by the other's extremism. For example, Bush justified his extremism by Al-Qaeda's extremism, ISIS justifies their extremism by occupying Iraq, and Trump justifies his extremism by ISIS's extremism.
Despite these structural similarities, their ideological differences and the end of their common goal (fighting the Soviet Union) led to a clash between the Conservative Western currents and the Islamist groups.

But it seems that these currents started to burn themselves in recent years. For example, 80 years of political arrests did not perish the Muslim Brotherhood. But one year of fail in ruling Egypt perished them. Similarly, nominate a decadent businessman is a big fall that led to the defection of the Republican Party, division its leaders, and alienated a large number of its supporters.

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Trump’s supporters


Not all Trump’s supporters are racists. Some of them are just very committed to the Republicans conservative values, so, they will vote for the party's nominee, even though if he does not present these values. They would see devil as a saint if he will get the republican nomination, and would see Jesus as devil if he will get the democratic nomination. 
I do not agree with these supporters; because I see Trump as a pig, whatever he is republican or democratic. But I respect these supporters, and I pity them, because they feel as if their party disappointed them by nominating such this man. Of course, it is very bitter for them to see that the conservative nominee is not conservative. 
But some of his supporters are very racists, and his hate speeches attracted them. Who you are is who you attract. And Trump attracts KKK. These supporters hate everything but WASP. For them, the word "great" means "white", so, to make America white again is how to make America great again. I cannot understand this statement in a different way; because America is still great. I am very worried about these supporters of Trump. I am not worried about this election anymore. Even republicans now know Trump will not be able to win. But I am still worried about what is after this election. 

One month before the election, 3 men who are members of Right-Wing ‘Crusaders’ Militia Group were arrested because they plotted domestic terror attack on Muslim immigrants in southwest Kansas. I wish this domestic terrorism is not just their first response, when they knew that their Trojan horse will not be able to jump in the White House.

http://kmuw.org/post/3-men-southwest-kansas-charged-domestic-terrorism-plot-targeting-somalis

Removing the religious mask of the Republican party



1- Yes, Abortion and homosexuality are sins in all Abrahamic religions. I disagree with my liberal Christian friends when interpret the biblical verses about homosexuality. But sin does not mean illegal. Sin is something God will punish me if I do, but illegal is something the government will punish me if I do. Sin is something I believe it is wrong and I should not do it, whatever it is legal or not. Your religion asks you to avoid the sin, not to forbid it. What makes a difference between a believer and sinner if the sin is illegal and unavailable? Do you think God should punish the people who desire the sin but cannot commit, just because it is illegal or unavailable? Should government punish the sinners or God? God allowed the sins in our life to challenge us: how can we live by it but not commit it. Abortion and homosexuality were legal in Jesus' time, and he never said they should be illegal. Rather, he distinguished between the state and the church when he said: “give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s, and to God what is God’s.” (Matthew 22:21) That is why you can be believer person and secular professional.

2- God is fair. He will not punish you for others’ sin. He protected the prophet Lot and his daughters. He did not destroy all Sodom’s people, just because some of them were sinning. The angels said after they destroyed Sodom: “So we brought out whoever was in the cities of the believers. And we did not find within them other than a single house of those surrendered to God.” (Quran 51:35-36)

3- Abortion and homosexuality are not topics in this election. Even the candidates did not discuss them in their debates. The republicans use them just to attract the conservative voters, but they would not change legislation of abortion or homosexuality, if they will win. Abortion is legal in the USA since 1973 during the republican administration of Richard Nixon. and the republican conservative presidents Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and George W. Bush stayed 20 years in the white house without changing the abortion law.

4- Legalization of abortion or homosexuality is not the president’s job. It is the Supreme Court justices’ job, and I believe that the justices do not decide based on their political views rather than on the constitution.